Definition of TeraFLOPS. Meaning of TeraFLOPS. Synonyms of TeraFLOPS

Here you will find one or more explanations in English for the word TeraFLOPS. Also in the bottom left of the page several parts of wikipedia pages related to the word TeraFLOPS and, of course, TeraFLOPS synonyms and on the right images related to the word TeraFLOPS.

Definition of TeraFLOPS

No result for TeraFLOPS. Showing similar results...

Meaning of TeraFLOPS from wikipedia

- multi-core POLARIS chip, which achieves 1 teraFLOPS at 3.13 GHz. The 80-core chip can raise this result to 2 teraFLOPS at 6.26 GHz, although the thermal dissipation...
- capacities. The entry level system costs ₹25,00,000; and performs at 1 TeraFLOPS and has a storage capacity of 4 TB. They use the Gluster software stack...
- computer has performance in the range of hundreds of gigaFLOPS (1011) to tens of teraFLOPS (1013). Since November 2017, all of the world's fastest 500...
- petaFLOPS, eight systems with com****tional capacities between 500 teraFLOPS and 1 petaFLOPS, and thirteen systems with capacities between 50 teraFLOPS and...
- CPUs on each computing node and was the first computer to reach over one teraFLOPS in 1996, holding the number one spot in the TOP500 list from 1997 to 2000...
- BladeCenter ch****is can achieve 6.4 tera–floating point operations per second (teraFLOPS) and over 25.8 teraFLOPS in a standard 42U rack. On May 13, 2008...
- performance metric of 4.19 TeraFLOPs. Compared to the original PS4 GPU, this is a 2.2775× or 127.75% increase in single precision FLOPs. Improvements in GPU...
- 3 MW needed for cooling. It had a theoretical processing speed of 12.3 teraFLOPS (TFLOPS). A single modern[when?] 4U rackmount server could match these...
- those found in personal computers were constructed and broke through the teraFLOPS com****tional barrier. Progress in the first decade of the 21st century...
- Portland, Oregon, on 16 November 2009. Tianhe achieved a speed of 563 teraflops in its first Top 500 test and had a peak performance of 1.2 petaflops...