-
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a
United States Supreme Court case in
which the
Court held that a
statute requiring...
- that the
person is
armed and
poses a
threat to the
officer or others. In
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada (2004), the
Supreme Court held...
-
dicta in
Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), at 439. However, in
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), the court...
-
probable cause after the fact
would be
inadmissible in a
court of law.) In
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada the
Court further established...
- they did not
decide the
Fourth Amendment issue.
Kolender was
cited in
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), as an example...
-
Wardlow (2000)
Florida v. J. L. (2000)
United States v.
Arvizu (2002)
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada (2004)
Arizona v.
Johnson (2009)...
-
Wardlow (2000)
Florida v. J. L. (2000)
United States v.
Arvizu (2002)
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada (2004)
Arizona v.
Johnson (2009)...
- "impeach" the witness, even if it had been
obtained without the warning. In
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada (2004), the
Supreme Court ruled...
- when not
operating a vehicle. However, the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled in
Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada that
states are
permitted to...
-
constitutional criminal procedure The 2004
United States Supreme Court ruling Hiibel v.
Sixth Judicial District Court of
Nevada upheld state "stop-and-identify"...
