-
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964), was a
United States Supreme Court decision that was a
companion case to Sears,
Roebuck &...
- misrepresentation. The 1964
decisions of the
Supreme Court in
Sears v.
Stiffel and
Compco v. Day-Brite
undermined the
application of the INS
doctrine to prohibit...
-
allowed Kellogg to reap
where Nabisco had sown. In
Sears v.
Stiffel and
Compco v. Day-Brite, the
defendants copied the unpatented,
uncopyrighted product...
- Gardner, Florance, La Duke, Anne."A Look at the Past: Williamstown, NY. "
Compco, Inc., 1991. Print. "Census of Po****tion and Housing". Census.gov. Retrieved...
- 4th June 2005 and
released 2006. In June 2006, the
Astoria was sold by
Compco Holdings to
property group Derwent Valley Central, for £23.75m. It was rumoured...
-
Charles A.; Saret,
Larry L. (Winter 1976). "Further
Unraveling of Sears-
Compco: Of Patches,
Paladin and
Laurel & (and) Hardy".
Loyola University Chicago...
- was non-executive
director of Fibernet, and was
chairman since 2002. For
Compco, he was
chairman from 1995 to 2003. In 2014 he
commissioned the founding...
-
federal patent laws do
create a
federal right to "copy and to use."
Sears and
Compco extended that rule to
potentially patentable ideas which are
fully exposed...
- (1964) U.S.
Congressional districts must
conform to "one person, one vote"
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. 376 U.S. 234 (1964)
preemption of state...
- repair-reconstruction
doctrine of Aro Mfg. Co. v.
Convertible Top
Replacement Co.
Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. -
Supreme Court, 1964. Held that state...
