- The
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (
AEDPA), Pub. L. 104–132 (text) (PDF), 110 Stat. 1214,
enacted April 24, 1996, was introduced...
- into law the
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (
AEDPA). The
AEDPA was
intended to "deter terrorism,
provide justice for victims, provide...
- The
AEDPA and IIRIRA, however,
limited relief[clarification needed] to LPRs and non-LPRs. U.S.
Attorney General John
Ashcroft argued that
AEDPA and IIRIRA...
- 1996 (
AEDPA). In a 5–4 decision, the
Court ruled that if the
government unintentionally failed to
object to the
filing of a
petition after the
AEDPA limitations...
-
Chapman v.
California by the
state courts was
unreasonable because of the
AEDPA. The
court held that
federal courts can not
grant habeas relief when state...
- final. The main
distinction between the MCA and
AEDPA, the
Court went on to explain, was that
AEDPA applies in
practice to
those prisoners serving a...
-
governed by the
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (
AEDPA),
which restricted significantly its
previous scope. The
purpose of federal...
- in the
United States: the
Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act (
AEDPA) and the
Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)...
- 1996 (
AEDPA) and the
Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) both
tremendously expanded the category.
AEDPA added...
- of the
AEDPA,
numerous suits have been
filed against state sponsors of terrorism,
particularly Iran.
Because some
courts have held that the
AEDPA does not...
